A genuine identifier can remain attached to packaging whose contents have changed. Conversely, a broken seal does not explain who opened it. Compare the digital check and the physical evidence separately when selecting a protection system for bottles, cosmetics or spare parts.
Reviewed on 5 September 2026. Written by Hashentic, one of the providers compared. The table distinguishes our implemented capabilities from the provider descriptions linked below. “Confirm” means the reviewed sources do not establish the exact feature; it is not a claim that the feature is absent. Recommendations are our assessment of fit, without comparative security testing or equivalent commercial quotes.
The decision behind the comparison
Securikett combines a security-label portfolio with the Codikett platform. Hashentic provides secure NFC verification and configurable responses, while physical tamper evidence depends on the chosen label and attachment. The useful comparison is the complete package-and-software configuration.
Make the desired result concrete: a customer should understand whether the identifier passed its check, whether opening is visible and what to do if the result is uncertain. Your support team also needs to distinguish normal use from a case requiring investigation. Automatic blocking should follow a defined policy, not merely a second scan.
Capabilities at a glance
| Capability | Hashentic | Securikett |
|---|---|---|
| Authentication evidence | NTAG 424 DNA and EM4425 cryptographic checks; static QR/NTAG215 are information links. | UID verification; NFC/RFID carriers, exact chip security to confirm. |
| Customer experience | Branded pages with templates selected by country, identifier type and labels. | Configurable response pages and role-based views. |
| Product passports | Configurable records and public JSON-LD data; required content must be verified. | DPP views within project scope. |
| Forms and automation | Forms, six triggers, ten action types and conditions; optional AI-assisted drafts. | Alerts; confirm the exact customer-form workflow. |
| Integration and setup | REST API, incoming webhooks, outgoing HTTP actions; supported desktop NFC writing. | APIs and optional webhooks. |
Sources: Codikett; Security technologies.
Hashentic: technology, forms, workflows and platform.
Pros and cons
Hashentic
Strengths
- Secure NFC, product records and customer forms can feed the same configured process.
- Your team can define follow-up actions and connect existing systems.
Limitations and trade-offs
- NFC message verification alone does not establish that packaging is unopened.
- Label construction, attachment and environmental durability require a separate validation process.
Securikett
Strengths
- A tamper-evident label portfolio, including VOID.
- Physical packaging protection can be included in the project.
Limitations and trade-offs
- Adhesion and opening behaviour need tests on your actual packaging.
- Agree which digital actions and security features are included with the selected label.
A pilot that answers the important questions
- Test intact, legitimately opened and re-applied labels on the same packaging.
- Repeat checks after condensation, abrasion and ordinary handling.
- Compare the customer result with the team's evidence and notification.
- Replace a damaged label and verify the handling of the old identifier.
Is Hashentic a Securikett alternative?
Choose Hashentic when you have a suitable label design or packaging partner and need secure NFC, customer pages and configurable follow-up actions.
Include Securikett when visible opening evidence and the physical security-label programme are central requirements alongside digital verification.
Compare the complete rollout
Ask for separate scope for artwork, label materials, application equipment, software, integration and replacement handling. Test samples from the intended production process. A label that works on a clean flat sample may behave differently on a curved bottle or a changing substrate.
Discuss your pilot with sample products and an agreed test plan.
